NickBlack.com

BP and the Storm of Idiots

Posted in Business, Economy, Environment, Humor, Peak Oil by nickblack on July 22, 2010

Is this possible? The Communications people at probably the most beleaguered large corporation on earth thought it would be okay to (badly) Photoshop an image of the control room. Make the boys at the screens look busier while they’re stopping the oil spill. And then say that it was just some kid showing off. Yeah, that’s reassuring. We are handling the greatest environmental disaster in America’s history, but we thought it would be okay to let someone play with Photoshop. Not really. First you will look like (even worse) idiots, and second, there’s a tropical storm developing in the Gulf.

But when you look at this Jon Stewart video it all becomes clear, in a terrifying sort of way…

Climate Gate and the new Porsche

Posted in Business, Collapse, Environment, Peak Oil, Science, Technology by nickblack on May 21, 2010

I was at the Frontline Club last night for an event called Climate Change: The Forgotten Crisis. I didn’t know we’d forgotten about it, so it came as a shock. I spend most of my time, when I’m not sleeping, thinking about it, so I must be a fanatic. The point is that after the so called “Climate Gate” business, climate’s been pushed to the back burner. Everyone’s fed up with the scientists and the question is: what are the challenges facing journalists and scientists in covering the issues? Or how can we make this interesting again without sounding stupid? Great panel with Richard Black, the BBC News Website environment correspondent, Julian Rush, the science correspondent for Channel 4 news and James Randerson for the Guardian.

Representing the Global Campaign for Climate Action, we had Kelly Rigg, who was fantastic. Yes, I’m a vile cynic and I not so secretly think we’ve passed half a dozen tipping points which will unavoidably make our species’ adaptation to a new climate iffy at best. But it’s people like Kelly that might pull us back from the brink. Of course we are about to blow past 400ppm like Valentino Rossi on a new Ducati, and the only way to stop that would be to stop the world economy for a while. And there aren’t too many journalists whose bosses would let them suggest that. Mind you, on current evidence it’s looking like a distinct possibility.

What saddened me was the feeling that we all knew this stuff. All the panel knew it. All the audience, many of whom were either journalists or activists, knew that while the science was fine, the forces ranged against a grown up discussion about the climate were vast, rich and winning. The unavoidable problem is that big chunks of the population are largely indifferent or they simply don’t believe it. There’s a feeling it’s all a bit of a bore and people are sick and tired of  being terrified. They’re already terrified about the economy without a bunch of campaigners telling them they’re evil for having a car and they have to dig up the garden and grow vegetables. Add in the people who think baby Jesus is coming back to save us, so it would be impolite to do anything, and you see the problem. There’s not enough of us to win. But we had fun.

For you up to the minute people out there, James Hansen and Makiko Sato have a new website which is updating data as it comes in. Hansen has been right for so long, and ahead of the curve for so long, he’d be bored if he wasn’t so dedicated.

So that’s it for the resource depletion/climate catastrophe trajectory, but what about the singularity/exponential innovation trajectory? It’s been a banner period since I got back from the Atlantic.

First, at last, a hybrid that doesn’t look like a re-engineered can of beans. I’ve never understood why hybrids had to be the ugliest cars ever designed. Thank you Mr. Porsche. They call it Intelligent Performance. Now some of you know I’ve been ranting about how we couldn’t let the christian mad have the phrase “Intelligent Design”, because we were going to have to use it, you know, to save the world and stuff. Well here it is…

Finally a hybrid that rich people won’t feel silly or pretentious driving. Because if the rich don’t like it, it isn’t going to happen.

Second, Craig Venter is now the most important biologist since Darwin. Artificial life is here. Every science fiction fan in the world is thrilled. All the religious are having the usual “are you playing dog” nervous breakdown. Evolution just took a left turn.

Third, my personal favourite of the week, a robot priest marries a couple in Japan.

If that doesn’t tell you the future’s arrived nothing will.

I’ve been continuing my reading on the humanitarian crisis, or rather the crisis in humanitarianism, and I’m wondering how this all plays into the scenarios above.  I’m reading (for the second time, the first time was so depressing I had to take a break) The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good, by former World Bank economist William Easterly, as well as Conor Foley’s The Thin Blue Line: How Humanitarianism Went to War and Linda Polman’s War Games: The Story of Aid and War in Modern Times. The gist here is that we spent $2.3 trillion since the end of WW2, did no good, did a lot of harm, enriched numbers of dictators beyond their considerable dreams of avarice,  got them nice places on the French Riviera and Malibu, perverted international law, and turned the whole thing into a questionable arm of western corporate/military hegemony. Hard to see why we don’t just quit.

Add to this Johann Hari’s rant in the Independent about the nasty connections between major environmental groups and nasty corporations, that are in fact killing the planet while lying about it, and now you know why I’m going to take my secretary for a week’s sailing in Turkey.

I try to be as cynical as humanly possible, and it’s still not enough to keep up with reality.

Welcome to the Real World, Mr.B

Posted in Peak Oil by nickblack on February 16, 2010

Well smack me down with a wet fish. Richard Branson has discovered Peak Oil. Where the hell you been boy? Way too much time on those Caribbean beaches. Maybe if some of us with some political clout could have dragged ourselves out of our swimmies long enough to do a bit of reading we might have had about a decade more to do some planning. Welcome to the real world Mr.B.

Tagged with: , ,

Ghost Acreage and British Immigration

Posted in Environment, Peak Oil by nickblack on January 9, 2010

I want to talk about a couple of things before I get down to Immigration in Britain and Ghost Acreage.

Last night I saw Avatar, the new James Cameron film. A truly remarkable piece of media. As I sat and watched the blue people in their perfectly realized forest ecology I thought ‘at last, we can do 3D biological reality’. Aside from the obvious impact on the entertainment industry I think it shows that computing got fast enough for us to be able fully implement an intelligent planet program. Just in time. We need to be able to produce and model large complex biologically coherent systems, like our own. We are approaching full neurological/cognitive immersion and it will change us fundamentally as a species. Cameron deserves to be congratulated on making this monster for $250 million. Well done.

The other thing is I’ve been spending the morning looking at the Burtynsky book, Oil. Rather than the rush of Avatar I sat and looked at the photos one at a time and had time to contemplate what the Oil civilization looks like on a global scale. We can’t go on doing this, it looks ridiculous. Do we really need to turn the left hand side of Canada into the world’s largest toxic lake district? We know better now.

Lastly, a quick word about today’s report on the BBC news site about Methane hydrate releases. This is very serious because we have no idea how quickly this quantity of Methane being added to the atmosphere and ocean can push us past some unseen tipping point into a temperature environment we can’t adapt to. I honestly believe we can technologically adapt to a new earth environment, but biological adaptation takes time and an enormous methane exhalation could radically alter the time frame against us.

Immigration in Britain and Ghost Acreage:

Which brings me to the real topic I want to talk about: Ghost Acreage in a world past Carrying Capacity. It’s probably helpful to define some terms here. Carrying Capacity is simply the population of any species that a given environment can support indefinitely. The term comes from shipping, as in ‘how much can she carry without sinking?’ In other words the maximum load. It all depends on what a species is taking from the environment. Populations tend to rise until they reach carrying capacity and then some critical resource, be it food, water, or something else, like oil or uranium, is sufficiently depleted that population is forced to adjust to the new depleted environment. Unfortunately populations tend to ‘overshoot’ the carrying capacity and subsequently crash, rather than adjust gradually over time. For those interested in serious chat about overshoot, William Catton is your man.

But how can a population exceed carrying capacity? In the natural world it doesn’t happen, but in the human world it does. Because of the concept of Ghost Acreage, which means the additional external acreage necessary to support the population. How does that work? Britain is a good example of a discrete ecologically defined habitat. Let’s just look at food. Estimates vary, but 35 million is a reasonable guess at the population that the island could support indefinitely, compared to its current population of 60 million. The UK imports around 40% of its food, so it seems about right. Okay so where is all the rest of the food coming from? Thailand, Brazil, India, Kenya, the US, etc. That’s Ghost Acreage – the land (or some equivalent) that’s not in Britain, but that it’s using to feed itself. Which means the people in those countries aren’t using it to feed themselves. This assumes that the countries supplying Britain with half its food have the spare acreage to do so, while maintaining the health of its own population. Aye, but there’s the rub. Population growth, especially in the developing world, has long since used up what spare capacity there was. Those people aren’t exporting food they have to spare (including the US, which is destroying its topsoil). The elites in those countries are exploiting landless labourers. We are in effect exporting hunger, drought, and ecological degradation to support our current population.

In an ecologically rational world, there can be no argument that we are entitled to run our population at someone else’s expense. It’s ironic that the countries and cultures from which we draw most of our immigration are also those we use for ghost acreage to support our over population. By allowing immigration, and thereby increasing Britain’s population, we are impoverishing another country’s population, which makes it less attractive to live in, and encourages further immigration (legally or illegally) to already over populated Britain (or another part of the developed world). It’s classic positive feedback.

What makes the situation even more bizarre is that as we impoverish people from the countries supplying us with ghost acreage we send aid, which runs to about £9 billion/year in Britain, and when the situation deteriorates to the point where the country fails, we send in the military and/or deal with the mass migration that results.

Britain is just a good example of the developed world. The current political environment in most of the West reflects the utter ecological illiteracy necessary to maintain the dogma that immigration is vital to the nation. On the contrary, it is lethal to the country’s ability to support itself, and lethal to the impoverished countries supplying the ghost acreage. As such it’s hard to see the ethical case for allowing immigration to either Britain, or the rest of Europe, which shares similar population dynamics.

It’s time we stopped the political equivalent of magical realism in thinking about immigration.

Recrimination vs Innovation

Posted in Environment, Peak Oil by nickblack on December 25, 2009

Since Copenhagen I’ve been reading some of the recriminations. Naomi Klein, George Monbiot, Mark Lynas, Fred Pearce et al, have all had a go. It was Obama, it was the Chinese, it was Gordon Brown, it was batman, it was that ugly cow outside the café smoking a cigarette, it was that smug bastard banker, it was those corporate swine, it was… them. God damn it, it had to be someone! People, we don’t have time. Hoping that the powers of the status quo are going to be the ones leading the revolution is naïve, and we don’t have time for that kind of naivety either.

There was no government program to invent anything that revolutionized the 20th century. Not for internal combustion, electricity generation, radio, jet engines, penicillin, TV, computers, internet, you name it. It was people with creative imaginations, and it’s people with imagination that are igniting the next revolution. But we have a fantastic advantage over the people at the turn of the last century: nearly instant global communication. Ideas can propagate faster than at any other time. Which means that we can see technological and social change on a scale and at a speed we’ve never seen before, which considering the way things look is just as well. We need to think fast, act fast and communicate.

I was lucky enough to see an advance copy of The Road, today. You want the answer to continuing business as usual? Go see it, that’s the answer. And if that looks like a good way to live, stay on that sofa and don’t do a thing. If on the other hand it makes you weep, as it did me, then time to get cooking.

First of all read Lester Brown’s Plan B. It’s a good place to start, and that’s the point, starting. It’s free online for crying out loud, how much better deal do you need? And quit whinging about how it’s all over and how on the downside of peak oil we may as well just kill ourselves because it’s a rollercoaster ride back to the stone age and there’ll only be 10 of us left at the bottom. And the world will turn into a burning desert by the time they bring dessert. Because it isn’t going to happen. Because we’re going to change the way it all works. Starting now, because business as usual is over.

Why would we want business as usual? We’ve produced one of the ugliest civilizations ever, the kids are so bored they’re knifing each other in the streets, we’ve killed nearly all the trees on the planet, the only alternative to war is shopping, everyone’s closet is so full of cheap Chinese crap there’s barely room to move, we’re pregnant at 12, divorced at 13, and permanently unemployed by corporations that thought what the world needed was a parking lot the size of Russia full of cars no one wants to buy. What? It’s the perfect operation of a free market and we’re just ironing out the kinks? So that a miniscule percentage of the world’s population can sit on superyachts in Monaco with illiterate topshop models dressed up like Moldavian prostitutes? The worst part is that even the people on the superyachts are miserable. All this affluenza advertorial mumbo jumbo has got everyone suicidal. Dear turbo capitalist, buzz off, you’re fired.

But we’re not going to get anywhere with this Green Puritanism business either. We can do without the endless cries of mea culpa from the guilt ridden of the rich world, and the fire and brimstone rhetoric from the climate preachers. First of all, half the population has been bamboozled by the oil companies’ disinformation campaign into thinking climate change is some dopey evil scientist’s conspiracy. So they’re not taking it seriously no matter what you say. Second, to get anywhere you have to have something more interesting than the drumbeat of doom. It’s no good droning on about running out of oil and expecting people to get all perky. You want to know about oil, ask a Saudi.

In this case Sheik Ahmed Zaki Yamani, Saudi oil minister in the 1970′s. His famous saying, ‘the stone age didn’t end because they ran out of stones’, is dead right. We’re not going to quit using oil because we’ve used it all, or all that we can get out of the ground economically. We’re going to quit using it because it’s a primitive way to get energy. Once upon a time it was the best we could do, fair enough. It had some unforeseen side effects, like bling bankers in lambos thinking they were cool and other lapses of taste. That and the carbon and the ugliness and the unliveable cities and the cancer and permanent war in the middle east. It’s okay, we’re over it, like big hair and shoulder pads. Oil is so last century. We are going to get our energy from Sun and Wind, and we’re going to use it intelligently. We’re going to do it in ten years and have a blast doing it.

First wind. I live more or less between London and Berkeley and I don’t spend a lot of time in Kansas, but I know three things about Kansas: it’s huge and it’s windy and not many people live there. Ditto other parts of the Midwest and Texas. We’re going to put up wind farms the size of Kansas and ship those electrons to the places people actually live on High Voltage Direct Current lines. HVDC is the business, or as they say in England, the dog’s bollocks. To be frank, why the English use the testicular architecture of the canine species as a metaphor for quality is a mystery to me. But that won’t stop Kansas being the Saudi Arabia of Wind Energy in 10 years. Or Texas. Or South Dakota. Or half a dozen other states.

And up north in Europe we can stop moaning about wind farms buggering up the scenery and get on with it. Put em out at sea. I know it’s already happening, but we need to get a move on here. There are still really inane problems with HVDC circuit breakers and network issues as well as some political problems with building a Europe wide intelligent grid so we can use electricity like grown ups. Well I’m prepared to bet that if we gave some people like say, the Claverton Group, one percent of the money Alistair Darling just gave the banks as a reward for bankrupting earth, we’d have the technical problems solved in a jiffy. As for the political arguments, let me put it this way: All you poli-sci econ majors shuffling round Brussels being important, if civilization collapses no one will care about the Norwegian national electricity pricing policy, will they?

Oh, and a word about buggering up the scenery. A lovely friend of mine bought me Edward Burtynsky’s new book Oil. Buy it and spend a warm evening by the fire in your second home in the Cotswolds, with the girlfriend Tamsin, looking at the ‘scenery’ in that book. Then email me and let me know all your problems with wind farms.

The Sun: Is it worth mentioning the fact that large areas of the US southwest are desert which is sunny a lot of the time? And that some of it isn’t really overdeveloped, not counting Las Vegas and Phoenix? So if you wanted to put up acres and acres of concentrating solar arrays it wouldn’t invade anyone’s personal space. Does this technology work you ask. On February 14th 1980, when my lovely wife Pepper Black (no, seriously) called me to let me know the contractions had started and she thought she might like to go to the hospital, I was on a roof installing a concentrating solar array in the San Fernando Valley. The sun worked in 1980, I assume it still does. To the tune of about 1300 watts a square meter. So instead of using all that metal to build cars and coal fired power plants and private planes and the rest of the left over 20th century rubbish we can build amazing solar arrays in the desert.

When we’re done in the US we’re going on holiday to the Mediterranean. Because it’s sunny there, just like California. So we’re going to build solar arrays there too. And, you got it, ship the electrons across Europe on HVDC. By the time we’ve done Spain, Italy, Greece, Morocco, Algeria, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and what’s left of the Levant if they can leave off killing each other for 5 minutes, we’ll have all we need for a while.

How will we afford all the resources we need now that the western world is broke? Lucky break, we have tons and tons of steel cunningly hidden as cars in those Russia sized parking lots. Time to recycle. And the workforce? What about we use some of those so-called ‘unemployed’ people who aren’t busy wasting their time in mindless office jobs and making those cars nobody wanted. And some of those kids who just laid out £20,000 for a degree with a street value of a cup of coffee. Right now they are all sitting at home on benefits looking at daytime TV which a)leads to brain damage and b) is a waste of valuable resources, namely talent and enthusiasm.

Dear Government People: pay them to do it. Hell, you’re already paying them to watch TV. Pay them a living wage and get them out there all over the US and Europe building and installing wind farms and solar arrays. Knock off £5000 of student loans for every year for the kids. Find out what they’re good at, what they want to learn, and set em to it. You’ll be amazed. Ship them all over the place, have them build new energy infrastructure, and they’ll have a great time.

Everyone seems mystified why the kids on the estates are killing one another. It’s because they’re bored, isolated, alienated, there’s nothing to do and nowhere to go and they’ve never met an adult who wasn’t a crack addict or a cop. Half of them have never seen the sea. How about we send them off to Spain, or the North Sea, or Kansas and have them work on real stuff, get some life skills that don’t involve murder, and maybe meet some adults who aren’t totally dysfunctional. Just an idea.

I said earlier that it wasn’t government programs that lead to inventions in the 20th century, and it’s true. It really is the imagination of creative people. But there is a place for government in here and it’s the ability to take on those new ideas and when circumstances require it mobilize millions of people and vast resources. And through the tax code give things a nudge in the right direction. Quit subsidizing carbon industries and start subsidizing wind and solar. I know all the free market people are howling. Excuse me, where do you think all those highways came from, private industry? No, it was a gigantic government subsidy for the car manufacturers in the 1950s. We did it for General Motors, we can do it for our kids.

Okay, now I’ve got a zillion tons of steel and a workforce of 7 million. No problem. We need about 2 million 2MW turbines and a billion square meters of solar arrays, (those are real numbers, except for the zillion) so get cracking. We need to do this over the next decade, which I know sounds like a rush, but hey we manage to make 65 million cars a year. You’ve heard of swords into ploughshares, well this is cars into windmills.

Pretty much the same set of ideas apply to pretty much the rest of the world. How hard is this? There are some technical issues, but nothing beyond the wit of man. We need some organization to get it all done properly. There are some political issues, and that’s the point – we need to stop thinking of narrow national interests here, because if our civilization goes tits up, there won’t be any national interests. There’ll be Viggo Mortensen and his shopping cart and you don’t want that.

Happy Christmas.

The Lie

Posted in Environment, Peak Oil by nickblack on December 16, 2009

Where was I? Oh yes, the lie. It’s not so much that the truth hurts, it’s that it’s so boring and pompous. Yes, the Cadillacs may go creeping now through the night and the poison gas, but that’s no way to encourage the young people. Endlessly telling them that the most ecologically sensible thing to do is commit suicide is no help. So we’re going to lie and see if we can turn it into the truth.

There are two competing trajectories, critical paths if you will, amongst the futurati. The most popular at the moment is 6 degrees of Apocalypse, you oil drunk fools, you will die horribly. The other, much less well known, is the Singularity: Humanity stands on the verge of the most thrilling period in its history. Now I ask you, which sounds like more fun?

In case you’ve been on a Buddhist retreat for the last 150 years in a Bhutanese cave I’ll run through the anthropogenic climate catastrophe for you. We were running out of whale oil and it looked grim, until Colonel Drake discovered real oil, which was a great relief to us, and the whales were thrilled to bits. We made Cadillacs and giant roads to drive ourselves to death on. We built towns in the middle of nowhere for no other reason than that we could. We found that Oil was the greatest aphrodisiac ever, so we all had way too many babies. We invented plastic which is shiny, cheap, lives forever and now we have a giant island of floating plastic rubbish in the Pacific the size of America. In the process we pumped billions of tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and poisoned the ocean, which turns out to have been a mistake. Now it looks like the average temperature on earth will make Reykjavik look like St Tropez  and civilization will drown in warm plastic soup. Which sounds terrible of course.

Okay, now for the lie, the Singularity. It’s really about the convergence of computing, space travel, biology and nanotechnology. Or utilitarian transhumanism if you want to get philosophical about it. Here’s what happened – just the highlights.

Computing: In the second world war a gay English cryptographer called Alan invented computing. Which was pretty incredible considering he was busy beating the Nazis at the same time. After the war the English, rather than develop a gigantic new industry and make billions, hid the computer, called Colossus, in a colossal warehouse like the one where they put the Ark of the Covenant at the end of Indiana Jones and refused to talk about it. When they realized Alan was gay they took away his security clearance in case he became a communist and he was so miserable he committed suicide. Which tells you a lot about the English.

But luckily computing continued to develop in America and we got ENIAC, IBM and mainframes. The spooky part is that in the mid 50s some boys were born within about a year of one another: Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Bill Joy, Scott McNealy and of course Steve Wozniak. Between them they gave us pretty much all the rest of computing, including the internet. Makes you wonder about cluster reincarnation. Nah, probably just a coincidence.

Anyhow by 1965 Gordon Moore, one of the founders of Intel, realized that semiconductor capability was doubling about every two years. He called it Moore’s Law (no surprise there) and the amazing thing was that it seemed to work not just for semiconductor capability, but the whole course of technological development for the last 40 years. In a few years it’s very possible we’ll make a machine smarter than us. Not science fiction, but really.

Biology: Then shortly after the war four scientists at Cambridge discovered DNA. Watson, Crick, Wilkins and Franklin. There’s an argument that Rosalind Franklin was really behind it all, but we’ll never know. We all know how guys are about girl scientists. Suddenly we could understand everything Darwin had been trying to say: we had a language of biology – molecular biology – and it went ATCG. Everything changed in the lab. By 2000 we’d mapped the human genome, three years earlier than anyone thought possible. Thank you Mr. Venter, who is now finding genomes all over the world’s oceans on his giant yacht Sorcerer II.

Nano: In 1959 Richard Feynman gave a talk called There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom in which he said he saw no reason we couldn’t manipulate matter at the atomic and molecular level. Not only was he one of the funniest men in science, he was also one of the smartest. He’d discovered Quantum Electrodynamics so when he started talking about molecular size engineering no one just laughed him off. But it wasn’t until the invention of the Scanning Tunnelling Microscope that we could see what we were doing. By the 80s Eric Drexler had published Engines of Creation and really got down to some detail about how we could proceed. 20 years later and we can build things at the molecular scale. It’s called Nanotech because it deals with structures less than 100 nanometres in size. That’s 0.0000001m. We are on the verge of mastering matter. In 10 years we’ll be there.

And then there was space. Space got off to a good start and when I was a kid lots of us thought we were on our way. It wasn’t to be. Arthur Clarke was maybe the only one who foresaw that there would be a hiatus after the moon landing. Me? I was packed and ready. We were going to live in space stations at the Langrange points and go out into the Galaxy. It was disappointing, but in the meantime things were going on. We got very good at satellite technology and NASA sent probes out into the solar system. What most people don’t know is that in the background big things have been happening: space drive. One of the overwhelming problems with space travel is the time it takes. 2 years to Mars. But a Venezuelan Chinese astronaut, Frank Chang Diaz, has developed plasma drive – VASIMR – and it works. Okay, it’s not Warp Drive, but it’ll get us out there.

You see what’s going on here? While a lot of us were having sex in the back of the Cadillac, some of us were getting some work done. In the last 50 years we’ve discovered more than in centuries before. I talked the other day about how the human cognitive system doesn’t like a downer, well it has a worse problem. It doesn’t have a good intuitive grasp of exponential change. It’s an evolutionary thing. We’re built for a linear change environment, so exponential change sort of creeps up on us and then we get surprised.

For the last half century technology has been accelerating – but it’s been the slow acceleration. Exponential curves have this inflection point where it’s going along slowly getting bigger and then boom, it heads for the sky. That’s where we are, the inflection point. These technologies are at the point of converging and the rate of change becomes almost instantaneous. Science fiction stops being in the future.

So what was the lie? It wasn’t. I was kidding you.

But doesn’t that sound like more fun than hunkering down in the disused nuclear bunker with the last three cans of organic carrots?

Apocalypse Now: The Musical

Posted in Environment, Peak Oil by nickblack on December 14, 2009

I know. The oil. The gas. The arctic, the albedo effect. The thermohaline. 386 ppm. 8 billion starving refugees by next week. I know. I spent years trying, unsuccessfully, to get a major documentary on peak oil made for PBS (American Public TV). I’ve met and interviewed most of the serious peak oil ecologists and geologists. Last night I sat watching Fora.tv (“the world is thinking”, oh really?). An hour long presentation on a tiny web screen by Dan Miller called A Really Inconvenient Truth. Yes, it is worse than Al Gore dared tell you. Yes, I already knew everything Dan had to tell me, as would most of the eco-oilers I know. We are like some goth punk death cult, avid for the new terror numbers of ice melt, storm surge or oil field decline.

Then, because of an unavoidable social context, I watched the penultimate final of X Factor. I watched for a while in sneering disbelief at the demented Karaoke of these guileless kids and Simon, their gurning svengali, all lit up like the Nuremberg Rally. I saw the crowds, crowds of 20 million – crowds for which any politician would sell their soul – cheering and screaming for their Stacey or Olly or little Joe. Every single ambulatory person in these kid’s hometown was on the street. This was the democracy they’d always wanted, the chance to vote on something they really cared about. The aspirational Viagra of instant celebrity, not just of the kids, but them, the hometown crew who have never ever known anyone on the telly before and now their hometown exists, and they exist, because of X.

And then the terrible truth dawned on me. We, the Collapse Literati, are doomed to write our pitiful blogs and make our tiny webscreen docs of impending Apocalypse to no avail whatever, unless we are simply entertaining ourselves. Al Gore had to train a legion of “Town Hall” speakers to spread the Inconvenient Truth. You see Simon Cowell wrestling with how to get his message out? No you don’t. Because one of the fundamental things about the human cognitive system is that it doesn’t like a downer. It likes up and preferably cute. It prefers bright lights shining on a perfect cleavage to earnest old men talking geology. I’ve watched for years as some of the most informed scientists and commentators on earth have put on their best suit and teeth to bore the living beejesus out of believers decked out in white people rasta hair and greenpeace fleeces, sitting on hard chairs in dank halls. For all the difference it made they could have been shooting heroin in the lavs.

The Association for the Study of Peak Oil, or ASPO, (pronounced Asspo, not a moment of marketing genius), began in 2000. Colin Campbell should be given the Nobel Save the Goddamn World Prize. I love these guys. They have done their best to make the world sit up and look at the oil horror movie coming to a planet near you. And Mike Ruppert, lovely guy, with his Collapse documentary. I hope it makes it to theatres. But do you for a moment think it’s going to have the impact, or the box office, of Roland Emmerich’s 2012? No, it won’t because neither Colin or Mike look as good as Amanda Peet in underwear.

My species likes stories where 5 good looking people save the world, or sing us to an anodyne consumer coma, or best of all, show us the perfect kitchen. They don’t like to be told no, you can’t have that, no it’s bad for you, no it will destroy the atmosphere and your children and grandchildren, forevermore, will live in a boiling desert next to a dead ocean. They don’t like to be told that now we’ve burned all the easy oil and had a damn good time whizzing up and down those freeways, it’s over and we may have to share the expensive stuff that’s left with everyone who didn’t get their go in a Cadillac yet, like the poor people from those countries we go to on holiday. How the hell is Cheryl Cole the hair extension replicant going to make that sound bouncy? Not even Cheryl could pull it off. (Yeah Cheryl, pull em off, nice one innit. Sorry. No disrespect intended.)

So we’ll have to lie.

We are never going to sell the great ruminant herd out there on the shopping Serengeti the idea that we’d better grow up and get responsible and treat the earth like the fragile little Christmas tree ornament it is. People don’t want to hear about efficiency, or cutting down, or organic carrot soufflé, or wearing a woolly over their lingerie because of green morality. Never going to sell.

So we’ll have to lie. Here we go.

We are moving into an unimaginable future of free energy, space exploration, bio and nano engineering, and artificial intelligence embedded throughout our lives. War, want, pestilence and decay will be things of the past. Old age and decrepitude will be remembered like images from a Breugel painting. Social networking will enable us to solve humanity’s problems in completely new ways. With 350,000,000 people working on a problem, be it poverty or middle east conflict, facebook will vote on the most democratic solution – X factor style. You can be part of the greatest experiment in history: to re-engineer the whole planet in 3 decades.

Details to follow. Stay tuned.

Intelligent Design

Posted in Collapse, Peak Oil, Technology by nickblack on December 13, 2007

Intelligent Design, as a phrase, has had a bad time recently since being hijacked by Creationists as a way to describe their er…“scientific theories.” Well, with apologies to the Lord, we need it back. For despite the glossy advertising and general glitziness of so much that passes for modern technology, most of it is pretty primitive. We’ve wasted the vast majority of the first trillion barrels of oil because of the way we operate. We spend vast quantities of oil and gas heating houses and businesses that are hilariously thermodynamically inefficient. It’s so bad that the new paper “Home Truths” from Oxford University suggests it’s possible to increase efficiency by 80%! If all those ideas were implemented it would very nearly halve Britain’s domestic energy consumption. The same is true, and probably more so, for the States.

What I mean by Intelligent Design is really two ideas. The first is to embed intelligence in most of the infrastructure that’s pretty primitive right now. We heat inefficient homes. We use a road and rail system that is unable to let us know how traffic conditions will affect our journey. We have designed a throwaway culture based on cheap plastics. Those plastics aren’t cheap, they only appear cheap if you allow the companies producing them to keep the waste products out of sight.

So suppose we begin to design everything with an understanding of the interdependence of everything and the massive advantages that can be made by including artificial intelligence in products – specifically to minimize energy and resource waste, both during manufacture and use. Obsolescence is obsolete. Designers need to take all aspects of the product cycle into account from an ecological perspective, that includes initial design, production, use, maintenance and eventual disposal. From this point of view the designer and architect have a fundamental responsibility to provide a sustainable infrastructure, a built environment, and the products that we use everyday.

Currently design is a function of least possible cost, rather than long life and environmental effectiveness. Perhaps what we’re looking for here is a general application of Bionics, not simply in the medical sense of implants and prosthetics, but in the more general sense of using natural systems as the basis for engineering and design. The work of Julian Vincent at the University of Bath is an example of the kind of thinking I mean: “Animals tend to do things using as little energy as possible but to maximum effect. That’s not always the way humans think, so it’s a great way to achieve a novel design.” It’s a pity that more ideas like this aren’t commonplace in the design world. But then maybe necessity will be the mother of all inventors once again.

Despite the bust in Bali and the ongoing avalanche of data that lets us know all our models have woefully underestimated the speed of climate change, we may have time to get this kind of new intelligence into the built environment. But to be realistic, we don’t have 3 decades either